Towards the beginning of this project I had interviewed Patricia Wakida of the Japanese American National Museum (JANM), and had wondered when and how I could talk about the diverse array of topics we covered. At first I had tried to steer the conversation towards the internet, towards a couple of blog projects (Discover Nikkei–a collaborative blog, connected to the museum, that deals with Japanese American culture and the JANM blog itself).
But soon we turned onto a topic that we both found extremely compelling: physical museum space versus online space. Now, the thing about curating an exhibition, according to Patricia, is that these (museum) pieces shown aren’t just objects. They contain personal histories, cultural histories, and more importantly visceral energies. So when dealing with a community’s history (and the objects that they hold most sacred), it becomes vitally important to preserve the aura of the artifact.
[As an aside, just writing this now makes me think of Walter Benjamin… possibly because of the word aura. But it’s still an interesting reference to consider when you try to project an original cultural artifact into an online blog or database. What is lost? What can or can’t be preserved?]
We touched upon a particularly resonant example of a hand-carved ancestral Butsudan Shrine. I asked Patricia if an online representation of the shrine would really do it justice, if one could really create a similar viewing experience in web formatted photograph. And truthfully, it is difficult. To create an intensely transcendent environment online is a completely different project from framing a piece within a gallery. Yet if the work is photographed properly, it still serves to educate and illuminate, even on a website. The online version plays a role. Perhaps not the primary role of the actual object, but still the role of engaging a wider audience and community of viewers (who, for whatever reason, cannot physically get to the museum).
To me, the role of the museum (and the role of JANM in particular) is to engage and portray a community of viewers. And for JANM, when displaying personal and historical objects, the memory of a physical space becomes immensely important. Going back to this idea of aura, the place of a community transmits a psychological energy that cannot always be conveyed elsewhere.
But even online, we can still create intimate and thought provoking experiences. We can provide interactivity, we can provide information for greater amounts of viewers. And we can do all of this with less funding than it takes to maintain a museum.
Why am I mentioning this? Because I heard this morning that the section of JANM that Patricia has been involved with has just been shut down.
So at this point, the discourse of physical space versus online space takes an even more critical turn. We now have to consider what it means for an online version of a museum to take precedence over its tangible place. Yes, funding has a lot to do with it. But I also think that it relates more to our increasingly internet-based world. Now that collections are online, it might be easier (and cheaper) for someone to just type in a website instead of paying museum admission and spending the day there. What does this mean for the role of the museum? Broader audience, yes. But loss of the physical aura of an installation? Or maybe just an increasing number of projects tailored to an online environment. [I’ve been posting about Dispatch, the online curatorial site that actually shows mostly internet-based projects].
But still. It’s something to consider… what is the difference in personal experience between the Museum and its online counterpart?